Balestena v. Top Notch Marine, Inc. et al
| Antonio R. Balestena, SR. |
| Top Notch Marine, Inc. and Top Notch Marine of Pompano, Inc. |
| 0:2018cv61467 |
| June 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft Lauderdale Office |
| Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale) |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Barry S Seltzer |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ENDORSED ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before July 26, 2018, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 6/29/2018. (hmo)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 6/29/2018. (hmo) |
| Filing 3 Defendant, Top Notch Marine's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal , Defendant's COUNTERCLAIM against Antonio R. Balestena, SR by Top Notch Marine of Pompano, Inc., Top Notch Marine, Inc.. Attorney Charles Stuart Davant added to party Top Notch Marine of Pompano, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Charles Stuart Davant added to party Top Notch Marine, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Davant, Charles) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Verified Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10778954, filed by Top Notch Marine of Pompano, Inc., Top Notch Marine, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint and other State Court documents)(McDonald, Eugene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
