Cohan v. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC
| Howard Cohan |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC |
| 0:2018cv61611 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft Lauderdale Office |
| Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale) |
| James I Cohn |
| Barry S Seltzer |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
PAPERLESS ORDER cancelling #10 Scheduling Conference set for September 6, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer in Courtroom 110, 299 E. Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer on 8/31/2018. (rsz)
|
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER re #11 Notice of Settlement. The parties' request in the Notice of Settlement that the Court effectively stay all proceedings in light of their Notice of Settlement is DENIED. All obligations on the parties and their counsel in this case persist until the appropriate dismissal papers have been filed. However, given that Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due on August 29, 2018, the Court will sua sponte extend Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint to Monday, October 1, 2018. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 8/27/2018. (slr)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 9/6/2018 at 2:00 PM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer on 8/13/2018. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS Order Cancelling Scheduling Conference set for August 10, 2018 to be reset. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer on 8/8/2018. (rsz)
|
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part #7 Joint Motion for Enlargement and Extension of Time. The deadline for Defendant to respond to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to and including August 29, 2018. Signed by Senior Judge James I. Cohn on 8/7/2018. (ek00)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC. Attorney Tamara Cheryl Jordan added to party Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Text of Proposed Order)(Jordan, Tamara) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Howard Cohan. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC served on 7/18/2018, answer due 8/8/2018. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2018 at 02:00 PM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer on 7/23/2018. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER SETTING CALENDAR CALL AND TRIAL DATE, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE: Trial set for 3/18/2019 at 9:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Senior Judge James I. Cohn., Calendar Call set for 3/14/2019 at 9:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Senior Judge James I. Cohn. Signed by Senior Judge James I. Cohn on 7/16/2018. See attached document for full details. (ail) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC. (ail) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James I. Cohn. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10820374, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Tamara Cheryl Jordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
