Groth v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
| Alex Groth |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 0:2018cv62050 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Taormina, Alisa) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Attorney Alisa M Taormina added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft). (Taormina, Alisa) |
| Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline as per DE 6 : JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. response due 10/24/2018. (lk) |
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Chase shall have untilOctober 24, 2018 to file a response to the Complaint in this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Attorney Brian C Frontino added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Frontino, Brian) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Alex Groth. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. served on 9/12/2018, answer due 10/3/2018. (Weisberg, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (ail) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10951488, filed by Alex Groth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Weisberg, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Groth v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Brian C Frontino |
| Represented By: | Alisa M Taormina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alex Groth | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Daniel Weisberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
