Rodenstock GmbH v. New York Optical International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rodenstock GmbH
Defendant: New York Optical International, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2018cv62054
Filed: August 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William P Dimitrouleas
Referring Judge: Lurana S Snow
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2018 Filing 36 Acknowledgment of Receipt of 18-14369-AA from USCA re #34 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by New York Optical International, Inc. Date received by USCA: 10/15/2018. USCA Case Number: 18-14369-AA. (apz) Text Modified on 10/19/2018 (apz).
October 15, 2018 Filing 35 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM by New York Optical International, Inc. re #34 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal,,. No Transcript Requested. (Leto, Matthew)
October 15, 2018 Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Orders under appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #34 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, Notice has been electronically mailed. (apz)
October 12, 2018 Filing 34 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal as to #25 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion to Expedite, #33 Order on Motion for Reconsideration by New York Optical International, Inc.. Filing fee $ 505.00 receipt number 113C-11069664. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (Leto, Matthew)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER denying #26 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/21/2018. See attached document for full details. (mc)
September 21, 2018 Filing 32 Clerks Receipt for deposit into the registry (bond) per order of the court (DE#25) received on 9/21/2018 in the amount of $ 1,400,000.0, receipt number FLS100173045 by Chaffetz Lindsey LLP. (vt)
September 20, 2018 Filing 31 REPLY to Response to Motion re #26 MOTION for Reconsideration re #25 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion to Expedite filed by New York Optical International, Inc.. (Leto, Matthew)
September 20, 2018 Filing 30 NOTICE by Rodenstock GmbH re #29 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, of Plaintiff Rodenstock GmbH that the Preliminary Injunction Bond Has Been Posted with the U.S. Treasury (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Wire Transfer) (Munn, Janet)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting #28 Unopposed Motion of Plaintiff Rodenstock GmbH for a two-day extension time to post the preliminary injunction bond. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/18/2018. See attached document for full details. (mc)
September 18, 2018 Filing 28 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Post the Preliminary Injunction Bond by Rodenstock GmbH. Responses due by 10/2/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Munn, Janet)
September 17, 2018 Filing 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re #26 MOTION for Reconsideration re #25 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion to Expedite filed by Rodenstock GmbH. Replies due by 9/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Munn, Janet)
September 14, 2018 Filing 26 MOTION for Reconsideration re #25 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion to Expedite by New York Optical International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Rodenstock's Arbitration Complaint)(Leto, Matthew)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Closing Case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/14/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
September 14, 2018 Filing 24 NOTICE by New York Optical International, Inc. re #23 Notice of Compliance and Opposition to Rodenstock's Argument Regarding Injunction Bond Valuation (Leto, Matthew)
September 14, 2018 Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (ls)
September 13, 2018 Filing 23 NOTICE of Compliance by Rodenstock GmbH re 21 Motion Hearing,, (Munn, Janet)
September 13, 2018 Filing 22 TRANSCRIPT of Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 9-12-18 before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-25 pages, Court Reporter: Francine Salopek, 954-769-5657 / Francine_Salopek@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter Francine Salopek before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter Francine Salopek or PACER. Redaction Request due 10/4/2018. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/15/2018. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/12/2018. (fs)
September 12, 2018 Filing 21 PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas: Motion Hearing held on 9/12/2018 re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction in Aid of Arbitration filed by Rodenstock GmbH.The Court will defer ruling on the Motion until Friday, September 14, 2018 to allow the parties time to settle this matter. Total time in court: 30 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Matthew Leto, Theodore R. DeBonis, Andreas A. Frischknecht, Janet T. Munn, Court Reporter: Francine Salopek, 954-769-5657 / Francine_Salopek@flsd.uscourts.gov. (mkz)
September 10, 2018 Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction in Aid of Arbitration MOTION for Hearing Request for Inclusion of Motion at Upcoming Hearing MOTION to Expedite Response and Reply to Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by New York Optical International, Inc.. Replies due by 9/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1" - Declaration of Wayne Goldman, #2 Exhibit "2" - Declaration of Alexander Duve, #3 Exhibit "3" - Declaration of David Amar)(Leto, Matthew)
September 6, 2018 Filing 19 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by New York Optical International, Inc.. (Leto, Matthew)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #15 & #16 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/6/2018. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
September 5, 2018 Filing 17 NOTICE by Rodenstock GmbH re #8 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Andreas A. Frischknecht. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10962750, #9 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Theodore R. Debonis. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10962908, #7 Notice of Compliance of Correction to Certificates of Service on D.E. # 7,8, and 9 (Munn, Janet)
September 5, 2018 Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Andreas A. Frischknecht. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by Rodenstock GmbH. Responses due by 9/19/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(Munn, Janet)
September 5, 2018 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Theodore Debonis. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by Rodenstock GmbH. Responses due by 9/19/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(Munn, Janet)
September 5, 2018 Attorney Theodore R. DeBonis representing Rodenstock GmbH (Plaintiff) and Andreas A. Frischknecht representing Rodenstock GmbH (Plaintiff) Activated. (pt)
September 4, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Compliance with the Court's Order of September 4, 2018 by Rodenstock GmbH re #13 Order Setting Hearing on Motion,, Set/Reset Motion/R&R Deadlines and Hearings, (Munn, Janet)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON COMPLAINT FOR #11 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN AID OF ARBITRATION. ( Responses due by 9/10/2018) Motion Hearing set for 9/12/2018 02:00 PM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/4/2018. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDER denying #8 & #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Theodore of Attorney Theodore R. DeBonis and Andreas A. Frischknecht. Notice of Termination delivered by US Mail to Theodore DeBonis, Andreas Frischknecht. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/4/2018. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
September 4, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction in Aid of Arbitration, MOTION for Hearing Request for Inclusion of Motion at Upcoming Hearing, MOTION to Expedite Response and Reply to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Rodenstock GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Sibylle Schumacher, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Chris Juergens, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Andreas Frischknecht, #4 Exhibit C1 - Exhibit to Declaration of Andreas Frischknecht, #5 Exhibit C2 - Exhibit to Declaration of Andreas Frischknecht, #6 Exhibit C3 - Exhibit to Declaration of Andreas Frischknecth, #7 Exhibit C4 - Exhibit to Declaration of Andreas Frischknecht, #8 Exhibit D - Proposed Order)(Munn, Janet)
September 4, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Leto on behalf of New York Optical International, Inc.. Attorney Matthew Leto added to party New York Optical International, Inc.(pty:dft). (Leto, Matthew)
September 4, 2018 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Theodore R. Debonis. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10962908 by Rodenstock GmbH. Responses due by 9/18/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(Munn, Janet)
September 4, 2018 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Andreas A. Frischknecht. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10962750 by Rodenstock GmbH. Responses due by 9/18/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(Munn, Janet)
September 4, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Compliance with the Court's Order of August 31, 2018 by Rodenstock GmbH re #6 Order,, Set Answer Due Deadline,, Set/Reset Hearings, (Munn, Janet)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule and Hearing on Complaint for Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Aid of Arbitration, New York Optical International, Inc. response due 9/10/2018., ( Preliminary Injunctive Hearing set for 9/12/2018 02:00 PM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.) Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/31/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
August 31, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Rodenstock GmbH. New York Optical International, Inc. served on 8/30/2018, answer due 9/20/2018. (Munn, Janet)
August 30, 2018 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Broward (Office Ft Lauderdale) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mc)
August 30, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to New York Optical International, Inc. (mc)
August 29, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mc)
August 29, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Aid of Arbitration against New York Optical International, Inc. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10953494, filed by Rodenstock GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Redacted Distribution Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Munn, Janet)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodenstock GmbH v. New York Optical International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Optical International, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Leto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodenstock GmbH
Represented By: Janet T. Munn
Represented By: Andreas A. Frischknecht
Represented By: Theodore R. DeBonis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?