Heinicke v. Mogo Dental et al
Plaintiff: Steven D. Heinicke
Defendant: Mogo Dental, Joseph Goldberg and 601 Dental Studio
Case Number: 0:2018cv62110
Filed: September 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2018 Filing 6 Certificate of Emergency with original signature by Steven D. Heinicke. (drz)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Closing Case and Denying as moot all pending motions. All deadlines are TERMINATED. Motions terminated: #4 MOTION for Appointment of Special Process Server filed by Steven D. Heinicke. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 9/6/2018. See attached document for full details. (lk)
September 6, 2018 Filing 5 Certification of Emergency by Steven D. Heinicke re #1 Complaint. (drz)
September 6, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Special Process Server by Steven D. Heinicke. Responses due by 9/20/2018 (drz)
September 6, 2018 Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 9/6/2018 in the amount of $ 400.00, receipt number FLS000010876. (drz)
September 6, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz)
September 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Request for Injunction against 601 Dental Studio, Joseph Goldberg, Mogo Dental. Filing fees $ 400.00 Receipt#: FLS000010876, filed by Steven D. Heinicke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(drz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heinicke v. Mogo Dental et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mogo Dental
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Goldberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 601 Dental Studio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven D. Heinicke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?