Beck v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Sangjun Beck
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and Bank of America Corporation
Case Number: 0:2018cv62155
Filed: September 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Altonaga
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2018 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Sangjun Beck (Pancier, Michael)
October 18, 2018 Civil Case Terminated, per #9 Stipulation and Notice of Dismissal. Closing Case. (ps1)
September 26, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc Thomas Parrino on behalf of BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Bank of America Corporation. Attorney Marc Thomas Parrino added to party BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.(pty:dft), Attorney Marc Thomas Parrino added to party Bank of America Corporation(pty:dft). (Parrino, Marc)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties by 10/29/2018. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 9/18/2018. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
September 18, 2018 Filing 6 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, NA on 09-18-2018 by Sangjun Beck. Waiver of Service due by 10/18/2018. (Pancier, Michael)
September 14, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Bank of America Corporation. (pes)
September 13, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) as to Defendant Bank of America, NA by Sangjun Beck (Pancier, Michael)
September 13, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) as to Defendant Bank of America Corporation by Sangjun Beck (Pancier, Michael)
September 12, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pes)
September 12, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10989783, filed by Sangjun Beck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pancier, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beck v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Represented By: Marc Thomas Parrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation
Represented By: Marc Thomas Parrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sangjun Beck
Represented By: Michael Anthony Pancier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?