Masaitis et al v. Marriott International, Inc.
| Joan M. Masaitis and Edward A. Masaitis |
| Marriott International, Inc. |
| 0:2018cv62446 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lurana S Snow |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in District of Maryland as case 8:18-cv-03388, filed 11/01/2018. (jua) |
Filing 10
ORDER of Transfer to the District of Maryland: denying as moot #8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting #9 Unopposed Motion to Transfer. Transferring Case to the District of Maryland (Bethesda); Closing Case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/31/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (ls) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 0:18-cv-62446 electronically transferred out to Maryland. (ls) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Change Venue by Edward A. Masaitis, Joan M. Masaitis. Attorney Gabriel A Garay added to party Edward A. Masaitis(pty:pla), Attorney Gabriel A Garay added to party Joan M. Masaitis(pty:pla). Responses due by 11/13/2018 (Garay, Gabriel) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), 6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Marriott International, Inc.. Responses due by 11/5/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration)(Duke, Samantha) |
|
Filing 7
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/12/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before October 22, 2018. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/12/2018. (eg01)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Marriott International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Duke, Samantha) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Cause of Action when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (ls) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Origin when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (ls) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ls) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11069706, filed by Marriott International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court File, #3 Exhibit B - Annual Report, #4 Exhibit C - Jury Verdicts and Settlements)(Duke, Samantha) Modified on 10/12/2018 (ls). [No Answer nor Motion to Dismiss Filed] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
