Hemmings v. CHIPTECH, INC. et al
| Lorian Hemmings |
| CHIPTECH, INC. and MAJID SATTARZADEH |
| 0:2018cv62457 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| Patrick M Hunt |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Parties must select a mediator within 15 days of Defendants' appearance. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 12/7/2018. (chd)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time for Mediator Selection by Lorian Hemmings. Responses due by 12/18/2018 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eiss, Charles) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Lorian Hemmings of Filing Return of Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service) (Eiss, Charles) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 11/19/2018. See attached document for full details. (chd)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING CIVIL TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 11/19/2018. See attached document for full details. (chd) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 7 Statement of: Claim (Amended) by Lorian Hemmings re #4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, Notice of Court Practice,, Set/Reset Deadlines, (Eiss, Charles) |
| Filing 6 Statement of: Claim by Lorian Hemmings (Eiss, Charles) |
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATRICK M. HUNT. The parties are advised to carefully review this Order as it modifies the time period for responses to discovery motions, limits the appropriate responses and objections to discovery, modifies the page limits on discovery motions, requires specific conferral requirements and modifies other discovery obligations. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt on 10/18/2018. (sl00)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters; Notice re Joint Motions; Expedited Service Deadline 12/17/2018. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/17/2018. See attached document for full details. (chd)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CHIPTECH, INC., MAJID SATTARZADEH. (bb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11072557, filed by Lorian Hemmings. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Exhibit Demand)(Eiss, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
