Plantation Open MRI, LLC v. Infinity Assurance Insurance Company
| Plantation Open MRI, LLC |
| Infinity Assurance Insurance Company |
| 0:2018cv62532 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James I Cohn |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re (51 in 0:18-cv-61825-JIC) Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS (1) Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PLAINTIFFS CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STAY filed by Plantation Open MRI, LLC, Plantation Open MRI LLC, Plantation Open MRI, LLC. Replies due by 12/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT D, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT E, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT F, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT G)Associated Cases: 0:18-cv-61825-JIC, 0:18-cv-62532-JIC, 0:18-cv-62533-JIC(Font, Jose) |
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER striking #10 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Defendant's Consolidated Motion to Dismiss Class Action. The Court clearly directed the parties to file all pleadings in Case No. 18-61825 only. DE 46, Case No. 18-61825. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 11/29/2018. (pjn)
|
| Filing 10 (STRICKEN PER DE#11)Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to (51 in 0:18-cv-61825-JIC) Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS (1) Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Plantation Open MRI, LLC, Plantation Open MRI LLC, Plantation Open MRI, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order)Associated Cases: 0:18-cv-61825-JIC, 0:18-cv-62532-JIC, 0:18-cv-62533-JIC(Font, Jose)Text Modified on 11/29/2018 (cqs). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting in part and denying in part (48) Motion for Protective Order; granting (49) Motion for Protective Order in case 0:18-cv-61825-JIC. Signed by Senior Judge James I. Cohn on 11/13/2018. See attached document for full details. Associated Cases: 0:18-cv-61825-JIC, 0:18-cv-62532-JIC, 0:18-cv-62533-JIC (pjn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting (42) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 0:18-cv-61825-JIC. Case No. 18-61825-CIV-COHN/SELTZER, Case No. 18-CIV-62532-COHN and Case No. 18-CIV-62533-COHN are hereby consolidated into the lower-numbered action for all purposes, pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. From this point on, the Clerk and all parties shall file all pleadings in Case No. 18-61825 only. A copy of this Order shall be filed by the Clerk in Case No. 18-62532 and Case No. 18-62533. The Clerk shall administratively close Case No. 18-62532 and Case No. 18-62533 and deny all pending motions as moot. Denying as moot #10 Motion to Dismiss. Trial is reset for the two-week trial period commencing November 4, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the case may be called. Calendar Call is rescheduled for October 31, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. These cases are re-referred to United States Magistrate Barry S. Seltzer to conduct a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.1.B for the purpose of setting pre-trial deadline dates. Signed by Senior Judge James I. Cohn on 11/6/2018. See attached document for full details. Associated Cases: 0:18-cv-61825-JIC, 0:18-cv-62532-JIC, 0:18-cv-62533-JIC (pes)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Infinity Assurance Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension)(Labrit, Suzanne) |
| Cases associated. (pes) |
| Civil Case Terminated per DE #8 . Closing Case. (pes) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Senior Judge James I. Cohn for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 10/26/2018. Judge Darrin P. Gayles no longer assigned to case. Order granting #5 Motion to Consolidate Actions. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 10/24/2018. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases 18-cv-62532 and 18-cv-62533 into 18-cv-61825 by Infinity Assurance Insurance Company. Responses due by 11/6/2018 (Labrit, Suzanne) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Infinity Assurance Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Infinity Property and Casualty Corporation, Corporate Parent Kemper Corporation, Corporate Parent Infinity Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Infinity Auto Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Infinity Indemnity Insurance Company for Infinity Assurance Insurance Company (Labrit, Suzanne) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Infinity Assurance Insurance Company (Labrit, Suzanne) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Class Action Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11094785, filed by Infinity Assurance Insurance Company. No answer and/or Motion to Dismiss attached. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of Removal, #2 Exhibit State Court Filings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Labrit, Suzanne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
