Caplan v. DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A. et al
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant: DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A. and SELMO SATANOSKY
Case Number: 0:2018cv62711
Filed: November 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Darrin P Gayles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to #10 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' Settlement Agreement. This case shall be dismissed with prejudice and closed. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
December 27, 2018 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Howard Michael Caplan (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stern, Ronald)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before December 31, 2018. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
December 12, 2018 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A.. Attorney Alan David Danz added to party DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A.(pty:dft). (Danz, Alan)
November 29, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Howard Michael Caplan. DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A. served on 11/20/2018, answer due 12/11/2018. (Stern, Ronald)
November 29, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Howard Michael Caplan. SELMO SATANOSKY served on 11/20/2018, answer due 12/11/2018. (Stern, Ronald)
November 27, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED as follows: Within fourteen (14) days of service of the Complaint, Defendants shall file a report with the Court indicating whether they intend to remediate the deficiencies identified in the Complaint and agree to pay reasonable attorneys fees in connection with this action, as determined by the Court or agreement of the parties. If so, Defendants shall include a timeline for remedation. If, upon review of the report, the Court finds that Defendants intends to remediate the property in a timely manner, the Court will administratively close the case pending remediation. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
November 8, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A., SELMO SATANOSKY. (amb)
November 7, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
November 7, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11144280, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caplan v. DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Represented By: Ronald E. Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DRS. BETTER AND SATANOSKY, P.A.
Represented By: Alan David Danz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SELMO SATANOSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?