Gonzalez v. American Security Insuance Company
| Oscar Gonzalez |
| American Security Insuance Company |
| 0:2018cv62866 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES Joint Scheduling Report due by 1/25/2019 Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by American Security Insuance Company re #3 Order, of Filing State Court Documents (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Circuit Court Docket) (Rimland, Stuart) Modified Text on 12/4/2018 (ls). |
| Filing 4 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by American Security Insuance Company. (Rimland, Stuart) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER on Post-Removal Procedures: Correct copy of docket in the Circuit Court Action due by 12/3/2018; American Security Insuance Company response due 12/3/2018. Parties to comply with Local Rule 7.2 by 12/10/2018; Plaintiff may file a Motion to Remand by 12/26/2018. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 11/27/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11187848, filed by American Security Insuance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Documents, #3 Exhibit Broward County Property Appraiser Public Records (accessed November 26, 2018), #4 Exhibit Affidavit of Jim Littleto, #5 Exhibit Plaintiffs damage estimate, #6 Exhibit ASICs estimate)(Rimland, Stuart) No answer/motion to dismiss filed Text Modified on 11/27/2018 (pcs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gonzalez v. American Security Insuance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Oscar Gonzalez | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Robert Duboff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Security Insuance Company | |
| Represented By: | Stuart Rimland |
| Represented By: | Bradley J. Aiken |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
