Rodriguez-Chomat v. Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C
| Rodolfo Rodriguez-Chomat |
| Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C |
| 0:2018cv62912 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/5/2019. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/15/2019. See attached document for full details. (ar2)
|
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C (McHale, Charles) |
| Filing 6 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C (McHale, Charles) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C. Attorney Charles James McHale, Jr added to party Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C(pty:dft). (McHale, Charles) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Rodolfo Rodriguez-Chomat. Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C served on 12/26/2018, answer due 1/16/2019. (Givens, Tamra) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11202923, filed by Rodolfo Rodriguez-Chomat. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Givens, Tamra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez-Chomat v. Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rodolfo Rodriguez-Chomat | |
| Represented By: | Tamra Carsten Givens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Receivables Performance Management, L.L.C | |
| Represented By: | Charles James McHale, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
