Tulloch v. Berryhill
| Gillian Tulloch |
| Nancy A Berryhill |
| 0:2018cv63056 |
| December 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lurana S Snow |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (proof of service due by 2/15/2019) Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 2/2/2019. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Nancy A Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pcs) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Gillian Tulloch. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 1/2/2019. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow for appropriate disposition or report and recommendation. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 12/14/2018. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 12/14/2018. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (pcs) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gillian Tulloch. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gillian Tulloch. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Gillian Tulloch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 IFP Motion, #3 Summon(s) US ATTY, #4 Summon(s) ORC, #5 Summon(s) Atty General)(Staum, Nora) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tulloch v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gillian Tulloch | |
| Represented By: | Nora Staum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
