Moncada v. Office Depot, Inc
Daniel Moncada |
Office Depot, Inc |
0:2019cv60334 |
February 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 3/5/2019. See attached document for full details. (wc) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Office Depot, Inc. Attorney Courtney Blair Wilson added to party Office Depot, Inc(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilson, Courtney) |
Filing 7 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties by 3/19/2019. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 2/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Daniel Moncada. Office Depot, Inc served on 2/13/2019, answer due 3/6/2019. (Duran, Pelayo) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order of Requirements (Verified Certificate Regarding Prior ADA Cases) by Roderick Victor Hannah on behalf of Daniel Moncada (Hannah, Roderick) |
Filing 4 Order Requiring Verified Certificate of Counsel Regarding any Prior Filings Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by 2/15/2019. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 2/7/2019. See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Office Depot, Inc. (drz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Office Depot, Inc. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11376979, filed by Daniel Moncada. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Duran, Pelayo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moncada v. Office Depot, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Office Depot, Inc | |
Represented By: | Courtney Blair Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Moncada | |
Represented By: | Roderick Victor Hannah |
Represented By: | Pelayo M. Duran |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.