Sydras v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Esdras Sydras |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 0:2019cv60401 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 4/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Defendant's Reply to Petitioner's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (McLester, Mindy) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Esdras Sydras. Attorney Joseph Samuel Wald added to party Esdras Sydras(pty:pla). Replies due by 4/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Showing of Good Cause)(Wald, Joseph) |
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Rule 7.1(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides that each party opposing a motion shall file and serve an opposing memorandum of law no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion, and that failure to do so may be deemed sufficient cause for granting the motion by default. Here, the record reflects that on February 20, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. The time to respond under the rules -- March 6, 2019 -- has passed and, to date, Plaintiff has not filed a response. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before April 2, 2019, Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion to dismiss and SHOW CAUSE in writing why Defendant's motion should not be granted by default. Failure to file a response or show cause as required by this Order will result in the motion to dismiss being granted by default. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 3/29/2019. (dpa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Responses due by 3/6/2019 (McLester, Mindy) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Petition for Declaratory Relief) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11393319, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Demand, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Copies of All Process, Etc., #4 Supplement Notice of Removal to Opposing Counsel, #5 Supplement Notice of Removal to State Court)(McLester, Mindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sydras v. Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Mindy Anne McLester |
| Represented By: | Andrew P. Rock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Esdras Sydras | |
| Represented By: | Pierre Andre Louis |
| Represented By: | Stefano Mittone |
| Represented By: | Joseph Samuel Wald |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
