Kennedy v. Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc.
| Patricia Kennedy |
| Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv60708 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Patricia Kennedy against Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles. See attached document for full details. (isc) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment After Default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles. See attached document for full details. (isc)
|
| Filing 12 Plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment by Patricia Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Clay, Amanda Ellen) |
| Filing 11 Clerks Entry of Default as to Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc. - Motions Terminated: #10 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 4/15/2019. (vmz) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc. by Patricia Kennedy. (Clay, Amanda Ellen) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Patricia Kennedy. Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc. served on 3/20/2019, answer due 4/10/2019. (Clay, Amanda Ellen) |
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED as follows: Within fourteen (14) days of service of the Complaint, Defendant shall file a report with the Court indicating whether it intends to remediate the deficiencies identified in the Complaint and agrees to pay reasonable attorney's fees in connection with this action, as determined by the Court or agreement of the parties. If so, Defendant shall include a timeline for remediation. If, upon review of the report, the Court finds that Defendant intends to remediate the property in a timely manner, the Court will administratively close the case pending remediation. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 3/19/2019. (isc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 3/19/2019. (isc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Patricia Kennedy Plaintiff's Verified Statement Regarding Prior Filings Under the ADA (Clay, Amanda Ellen) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Patricia Kennedy (Clay, Amanda Ellen) |
| Filing 4 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Patricia Kennedy (Clay, Amanda Ellen) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc.. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Patricia Kennedy. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11485172, filed by Patricia Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Clay, Amanda Ellen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kennedy v. Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shree Ram Jalaram, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia Kennedy | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Ellen Ballard Clay |
| Represented By: | Thomas B. Bacon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
