Kennedy v. Karishma Riya Inc.
Plaintiff: Patricia Kennedy
Defendant: Karishma Riya Inc. and Karishma Riya Inc. a Georgia Corporation doing business as Country Hearth Inn & Suites
Case Number: 0:2019cv60764
Filed: March 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy K Altman
Referring Judge: Patrick M Hunt
2 Judge: K Michael Moore
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 7/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE re: #14 Notice of Settlement; Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 05/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
May 17, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by Patricia Kennedy (Houston, Kathy)
May 16, 2019 Filing 13 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Patricia Kennedy (Houston, Kathy)
April 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificate of Interested Parties. The Parties are directed to file a Joint Scheduling Report by May 13, 2019. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 4/29/2019. See attached document for full details. (ra)
April 29, 2019 Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Karishma Riya Inc.. (Behar, Aaron)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint. Defendant shall file his answer by April 29, 2019. Counsel shall note that no further extensions to this deadline will be granted. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 4/26/2019. (vve)
April 23, 2019 Filing 9 Clerks Notice to Filer re #8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to File Response to Complaint . Wrong Motion Relief(s) Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls)
April 22, 2019 Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Karishma Riya Inc.. Responses due by 5/6/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Behar, Aaron) Modified Relief on 4/23/2019 (ls).
April 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT to Judge Roy Altman for all further proceedings, Chief Judge K. Michael Moore no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 4/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (yar)
April 9, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Aaron Behar on behalf of Karishma Riya Inc.. Attorney Aaron Behar added to party Karishma Riya Inc.(pty:dft). (Behar, Aaron)
March 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATRICK M. HUNT. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Hunt's discovery procedures. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/25/2019. (ah03)
March 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuits Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court.Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/25/2019. (ah03)
March 25, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Karishma Riya Inc.. (jao)
March 24, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
March 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Karishma Riya Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11499690, filed by Patricia Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Houston, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kennedy v. Karishma Riya Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karishma Riya Inc.
Represented By: Aaron Behar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karishma Riya Inc. a Georgia Corporation doing business as Country Hearth Inn & Suites
Represented By: Aaron Behar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Kennedy
Represented By: Kathy L. Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?