SMART v. TOP PARK SERVICES LLC
| MICHAEL SMART |
| TOP PARK SERVICES LLC |
| 0:2019cv61054 |
| April 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT to Judge Rodney Smith for all further proceedings, Judge Kathleen M. Williams no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (yar)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by TOP PARK SERVICES LLC. (Gay, Christine) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 6/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle on 5/10/2019. (sd01)
|
| Filing 5 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by TOP PARK SERVICES LLC. Attorney Christine Fuqua Gay added to party TOP PARK SERVICES LLC(pty:dft). (Gay, Christine) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERRAL CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters and Notice of Court Practices and Procedures. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 5/2/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to TOP PARK SERVICES LLC. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11589046, filed by MICHAEL SMART. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Tuschman, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMART v. TOP PARK SERVICES LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL SMART | |
| Represented By: | Richard David Tuschman |
| Represented By: | Mark J. Beutler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TOP PARK SERVICES LLC | |
| Represented By: | Christine Fuqua Gay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
