Corrente v. Berryhill
| Cynthia Corrente |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 0:2019cv61482 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Patrick M Hunt |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed. Office of the Regional Counsel, Region IV, served on 7/25/2019, answer due 9/23/2019. (ar2) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney General served on 7/25/2019, answer due 9/23/2019. (ar2) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney served on 7/24/2019, answer due 9/23/2019. (ar2) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (cqs) |
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered. Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service at #1 Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt on 6/27/2019. (hhr)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (kpe) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cynthia Corrente. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Cynthia Corrente. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Region IV, #2 Summon(s) Fort Lauderdale Attorney's Office, #3 Summon(s) Attorney General, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Affidavit Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis)(Goetz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Corrente v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cynthia Corrente | |
| Represented By: | David B. Goetz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
