Caplan v. CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC.
| Howard Michael Caplan |
| CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC. |
| 0:2019cv61488 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 3/16/2020 before Judge Kathleen M. Williams., Calendar Call set for 3/10/2020 11:00 AM before Judge Kathleen M. Williams.), ( Mediation Deadline 11/27/2019.) Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/29/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 8 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Howard Michael Caplan (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC.. Attorney Norman Elliott Kent added to party CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC.(pty:dft). (Kent, Norman) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other by Ronald E. Stern on behalf of Howard Michael Caplan (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC. served on 6/18/2019, answer due 7/9/2019. (Stern, Ronald) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Referral Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle And Notice of Court Practice. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (vmz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC. (vmz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (vmz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11732436, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caplan v. CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan | |
| Represented By: | Ronald E. Stern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CARLOS AUTOBODY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Norman Elliott Kent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
