Sharda Building, LLC et al v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
| Sharda Building, LLC, Ruth Narkes and Abraham Narkes |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 0:2019cv61505 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Scottsdale Insurance Company Notice of Conflict (Seale, Nyasha) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Mediator Selection and Hearing. Added Frank J. Allocca. Mediation Hearing set for 11/12/2019 at 12:00 P.M.. (Chaplin, James) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Compliance with Rule 26 Disclosures by Abraham Narkes, Ruth Narkes, Sharda Building, LLC (Wisniewski, Brian) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added Scottsdale Insurance Company, Frank J. Allocca. (Robinson, Lucie) |
| Filing 8 State court record Court Record, (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s), #4 Defendant's Notice of Appearance, #5 Defendant's Notice of Removal)(Seale, Nyasha) |
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT Removal Status Report by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Seale, Nyasha) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Scottsdale Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Insurance Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company (Seale, Nyasha) |
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (ap00)
|
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for the two week period starting 2/18/2020 before Judge Federico A. Moreno. Calendar Call set for 2/11/2020 before Judge Federico A. Moreno. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (ap00) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Seale, Nyasha) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11737604, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. No Answer and/or Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Scottsdale's Annual Report, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit Sharda's Annual Report, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Articles of Organization, #5 Exhibit Plaintiff's Property Deed, #6 Exhibit Plaintiff's Estimate, #7 Exhibit Plaintiff's Invoices, #8 Exhibit Correspondence, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Copies of All Service of Process)(Seale, Nyasha) Modified on 6/18/2019 (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
