Johnson v. Marriott International, Inc et al
| Robert Johnson |
| Jake Resnicow, Marriott International, Inc, Scott Hauser Events, Scott Hauser and Ivan Poljak |
| 0:2019cv61564 |
| June 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendants shall file a coordinated response to the Complaint within twenty days of all Defendants being served with process. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by Scott Hauser, Marriott International, Inc, Scott Hauser Events. Attorney Daniel Frederick Blonsky added to party Scott Hauser(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel Frederick Blonsky added to party Scott Hauser Events(pty:dft). (Blonsky, Daniel) |
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Defendant Marriott International, Inc.'s, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's Response shall be filed on or before August 29, 2019. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Respond to Complaint by Marriott International, Inc. Attorney Daniel Frederick Blonsky added to party Marriott International, Inc(pty:dft). (Blonsky, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Jake Resnicow. (drz) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ivan Poljak. (drz) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Marriott International, Inc. (drz) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Scott Hauser. (drz) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Scott Hauser Events. (drz) |
| Filing 8 Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scott Hauser, Marriott International, Inc, Ivan Poljak, Jake Resnicow, Scott Hauser Events. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11754949, filed by Robert Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s))(Hindi, Jibrael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
