Metellus v. Department of Corrections
| Kens Metellus |
| Department of Corrections |
| 0:2019cv61591 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Georgina Jimenez-Orosa on behalf of Department of Corrections. Attorney Georgina Jimenez-Orosa added to party Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Jimenez-Orosa, Georgina) |
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 28 U.S.C. 2254 on or before forty-five days from the date of this order the respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Verification of Petition for Writ of Fabeas Corpus by Kens Metellus re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jas) |
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Appeal Filing Fee received on 7/9/2019 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS100190504. (jcs) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO VERIFY PETITION on or before July 25, 2019., ( Responses due by 7/25/2019) Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 6/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Verification Form) (fbn)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH DETAILED AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 7/25/2019. Motions due by 7/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 6/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (fbn)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00, NOT PAID, filed by Kens Metellus.(ebz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Metellus v. Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North |
| Represented By: | Georgina Jimenez-Orosa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kens Metellus | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
