Afily8 Government Solutions LLC v. United States Government
| Afily8 Government Solutions LLC |
| United States Government |
| 0:2019cv61698 |
| July 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re #9 Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program; Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, Closing Case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 7/29/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Afily8 Government Solutions LLC. (mc) |
| Filing 8 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Afily8 Government Solutions LLC to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: jfrantz@wesendfast.com (vmz) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing by Afily8 Government Solutions LLC (vmz) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Corrections for Request for Relief Sought, MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Responses due by 8/1/2019) by Afily8 Government Solutions LLC. (vmz) Modified file date on 7/18/2019 (vmz). |
| Filing 5 Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge NOT SIGNED by all parties. Filed by Afily8 Government Solutions LLC (vmz) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 7/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (vmz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Government. (ar2) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Government. Filing fees $ 400.00, filed by Afily8 Government Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit I, #3 Exhibit II)(ar2) (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/11/2019) (ar2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Afily8 Government Solutions LLC v. United States Government | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Afily8 Government Solutions LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Government | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
