Cohan v. Beall's Inc.
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Defendant: Beall's Inc.
Case Number: 0:2019cv61775
Filed: July 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodolfo A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REQUIRING INSPECTION REPORT AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. On or before September 23, 2019, Plaintiff shall file an Inspection Report in accordance with this Order. Defendant shall file a Defendant's Inspection Report on or before October 7, 2019. The parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Seltzer's Chambers to schedule a settlement conference in accordance with this Order. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 9/9/2019. (mhn)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES on or before October 7, 2019. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 9/9/2019. (mhn)
September 9, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Beall's Inc.. (Fine, Robert)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING ASIDE CLERK'S DEFAULT. The #10 Clerk's Entry of Default is VACATED. Defendant shall files its Answer and Affirmative Defenses on the Court's docket on or before September 13, 2019. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 9/9/2019. (mhn)
September 6, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION to Vacate #8 Order, #10 Clerks Entry/Non-Entry of Default, #11 Order, by Beall's Inc.. Attorney Robert Stewart Fine added to party Beall's Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 9/20/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Fine, Robert)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ON DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT PROCEDURE. Plaintiff must file a Motion for Default Final Judgment on or before September 6, 2019. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 8/28/2019. (mhn) (Main Document 11 replaced on 8/29/2019) (gp).
August 28, 2019 Filing 10 VACATED - Clerks Entry of Default as to Beall's, Inc. - Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 8/28/2019. (pes) Modified per DE #13 on 9/9/2019 (pes).
August 27, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to Beall's Inc. by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service, #2 Exhibit Docket Sheet)(Sconzo, Gregory)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 VACATED - ORDER REQUIRING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT. Plaintiff shall submit a motion for entry of clerk's default no later than August 30, 2019 . See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 8/26/2019. (mhn) Modified per DE #13 on 9/9/2019 (pes).
August 23, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Beall's Inc. served on 7/25/2019, answer due 8/15/2019. (Sconzo, Gregory)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO PERFECT SERVICE. On or before October 15, 2019 , Plaintiff shall perfect service upon Defendant or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to perfect service of process. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 8/20/2019. (mhn)
August 1, 2019 Filing 5 RESPONSE to #4 Order of Requirements, by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sconzo, Gregory)
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL. Plaintiff's counsel shall file a verified response to this Order on or before August 1, 2019. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 7/16/2019. See attached document for full details. (mhn)
July 16, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Beall's Inc.. (jao)
July 16, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
July 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beall's Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11817890, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cohan v. Beall's Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Represented By: Gregory Steven Sconzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beall's Inc.
Represented By: Robert Stewart Fine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?