Moncada v. Panera, LLC
| Daniel Moncada |
| Panera, LLC |
| 0:2019cv61795 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE re #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice by Daniel Moncada (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Parties shall file their Stipulation of Dismissal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 no later than September 12, 2019. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Daniel Moncada (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Daniel Moncada. Panera, LLC served on 7/22/2019, answer due 8/12/2019. (Hannah, Roderick) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/9/2019) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/24/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Panera, LLC. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Panera, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11822851, filed by Daniel Moncada. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Hannah, Roderick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moncada v. Panera, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Panera, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Moncada | |
| Represented By: | Roderick Victor Hannah |
| Represented By: | Pelayo M. Duran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
