Dennett v. SSA
| Pedro H. Dennett |
| SSA |
| 0:2019cv61817 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (the "Application"). Plaintiff's #1 Complaint is missing pages. Consequently, the undersigned entered an #5 Order directing Plaintiff to re-file the Complaint in its entirety and prepare the appropriate summonses. To date, however, Plaintiff has not re-filed the Complaint or prepared the summonses, as directed by the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Application is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has until September 5, 2019 to re-file the Complaint in its entirety, prepare and file the summonses, and re-submit the Application. Failure to comply with this Order may result in this matter being dismissed with prejudice without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle on 8/22/2019. (sr00)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Re-File Complaint in its Entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle on 8/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (sr00)
|
| Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle. Motions referred to Judge Alicia O. Valle. (mno) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (lk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Pedro H. Dennett. (lk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SSA. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Pedro H. Dennett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dennett v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pedro H. Dennett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SSA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
