Display Technologies, LLC v. Inmusic, LLC
Plaintiff: Display Technologies, LLC
Defendant: INMUSIC, LLC
Case Number: 0:2019cv61896
Filed: July 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: K Michael Moore
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2019 Reset Answer Due Deadline: Inmusic, LLC response due 10/31/2019. (ls)(per DE #14)
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. #12 . Therein, Plaintiff requests an extension of time for Defendant Inmusic, LLC to respond to the Complaint and serve its invalidity contentions to "allow Defendant additional time to investigate the allegations of Plaintiff's Complaint." #12 at 1. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion #12 is GRANTED. Defendant Inmusic, LLC shall respond to the Complaint on or before October 31, 2019 and shall serve its invalidity contentions on or before October 23, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/20/2019. (mh01)
September 19, 2019 Filing 13 Clerks Notice to Filer re #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise repond to Plaintiff's Complaint and for Defendant to serve its Invalidity Contentions re #6 Pretrial Order, #1 Complaint. Wrong Motion Relief(s) Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls)
September 19, 2019 Filing 12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Display Technologies, LLC. Responses due by 10/3/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wernow, Howard) Modified Relief on 9/19/2019 (ls). Added MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to serve its invalidity contentions re #6 Pretrial Order on 9/19/2019 (ls).
August 16, 2019 Filing 11 Certificate of Other Affiliates by Display Technologies, LLC (Wernow, Howard)
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filings. #9 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion #9 is GRANTED. Jay Johnson may appear Pro Hac Vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jay@kjpllc.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/14/2019. (ah03)
August 13, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jay Johnson. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11898728 by Display Technologies, LLC. Responses due by 8/27/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Wernow, Howard)
August 9, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Compliance regarding asserted claims and infringement contentions by Display Technologies, LLC re #6 Pretrial Order (Wernow, Howard)
August 6, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Display Technologies, LLC. INMUSIC, LLC waiver sent on 8/2/2019, answer due 10/1/2019. (Wernow, Howard)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PATENT PRETRIAL ORDER Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 7/29/2019. See attached document for full details. (ah03)
July 29, 2019 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Display Technologies, LLC (Wernow, Howard)
July 29, 2019 Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (pcs)
July 29, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to INMUSIC, LLC. (pcs)
July 26, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pcs)
July 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INMUSIC, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11850300, filed by Display Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 9,300,723, #2 Summon(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wernow, Howard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Display Technologies, LLC v. Inmusic, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Display Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Howard L. Wernow
Represented By: Jay Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INMUSIC, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?