Bernardo v. Hotwire Communications, LTD.
| Ricardo Bernardo |
| Hotwire Communications, LTD. |
| 0:2019cv61988 |
| August 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Barry S Seltzer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPORT REGARDING Electronically Stored Information to Joint Planning and Scheduling Report by Ricardo Bernardo (Falzon, Anthony) |
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. No discovery motions shall be filed with the Court unless specifically authorized by Order. In the event a discovery dispute does arise, counsel are instructed to meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the dispute. If, after conferring, the parties cannot resolve their discovery dispute, the movant must seek relief whin 14 days after the grounds for relief occur by contacting the undersigneds Chambers (954-769-5450) and scheduling a discovery hearing. The movant shall have first conferred with opposing counsel and obtained three alternative dates and times that both counsel are available for a hearing. The attorney or other person with knowledge who telephones the Court shall have the following information: (a) the nature of the discovery dispute; (b) the efforts made to confer with opposing counsel; and (c) three agreed upon dates for a hearing. The Court will then set the matter for hearing and order the parties to submit a joint status report on the issues. Where there has been a complete failure to respond to discovery, and where good faith efforts have been made (without success) to obtain that discovery, counsel need not obtain agreed upon dates, but shall so inform the Court telephonically of the issue, and the Court will set the matter for hearing. Finally, when the parties have stipulated to the entry of an order, such as stipulated confidentiality order, the parties shall not file a motion for entry of the stipulated order. Instead, counsel shall email to Chambers (seltzer@flsd.uscourts.gov) a copy of the proposed stipulated order in Word or WordPerfect format, with a statement that the parties have agreed to entry of the proposed order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer on 9/6/2019. (pb00)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER SETTING CIVIL TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MOTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: (Jury Trial set for 8/17/2020 before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Calendar Call set for 8/12/2020 09:30 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Status Conference set for 5/27/2020 10:00 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 9/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (pcs) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Joint Planning and Scheduling Report by Ricardo Bernardo re #6 Order,,, Parties Joint Scheduling Report (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order, #2 Exhibit Election to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge for discovery) (Falzon, Anthony) Modified text on 9/4/2019 (kpe). |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Ricardo Bernardo (Falzon, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY by Ricardo Bernardo for dates of November 22, 2019 through December 2, 2019; December 20, 2019 through January 6, 2020 (Falzon, Anthony) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before September 2, 2019, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 8/19/2019. (jdo)
|
| Filing 5 Hotwire Communications Ltd's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Hotwire Communications, LTD.. (Boos, Eric) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 8/8/2019. (jdo) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Cause of Action when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (vmz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (vmz) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Bernardo v. Hotwire Communications, Ltd.) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11884214, filed by Hotwire Communications, LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Boos, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bernardo v. Hotwire Communications, LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hotwire Communications, LTD. | |
| Represented By: | Eric Stephen Boos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ricardo Bernardo | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Vincent Falzon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
