AEC/Pines development LTD v. Zeigler
| AEC/Pines development LTD |
| Markiva Zeigler |
| 0:2019cv62027 |
| August 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lurana S Snow |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by 17th Judicial Circuit Clerk of Circuit and County Courts as to #7 Order Remanding Case to State Court (mee) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Compliance (copy of order mailed to address listed on order) re #7 Order Remanding Case to State Court (mee) |
Filing 7
ORDER REMANDING CASE. Closing Case. Denied as Moot: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Markiva Zeigler. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 6 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order Remanding Case to: 17th Judicial Circuit Court. State Court Case Number: COCE-19-018140 (Attachments: #1 Order) (mee) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance (copy of order mailed to address listed on order) re #4 Order Remanding Case to State Court (mee) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REMANDING CASE. Remanding Case to State Court. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Markiva Zeigler. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint-Count 1-Tenant Eviction) Filing fee $400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Markiva Zeigler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(drz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/14/2019: #2 Supplemental Notice of Removal) (drz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AEC/Pines development LTD v. Zeigler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Markiva Zeigler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AEC/Pines development LTD | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth James Lowenhaupt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
