J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC. v. PROPAGO, LLC
J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC. |
PROPAGO, LLC |
0:2019cv62063 |
August 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Roy K Altman |
Patrick M Hunt |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION filed by PROPAGO, LLC. (McMahon, Paul) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION filed by J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC.. Replies due by 10/9/2019. (Shalek, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report (Joint Scheduling Report due by 10/30/2019) Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 10/2/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #7 the Plaintiff's Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Plaintiff's response shall be due by October 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 9/16/2019. (jz00) |
Filing 7 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC.. (Shalek, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION by PROPAGO, LLC. Attorney Paul Joseph McMahon added to party PROPAGO, LLC(pty:dft). Responses due by 9/24/2019 (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(McMahon, Paul) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to PROPAGO, LLC. (ebz) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s)) (Shalek, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11908879, filed by J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC..(Shalek, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC. v. PROPAGO, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PROPAGO, LLC | |
Represented By: | Paul Joseph McMahon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC. | |
Represented By: | Gary Stephen Phillips |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Bruce Shalek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.