Weiner v. AIG Property Casualty Company
Plaintiff: Darryl Weiner
Defendant: AIG Property Casualty Company
Case Number: 0:2019cv62079
Filed: August 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodolfo A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2019 Filing 18 Initial Disclosure(s) of Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) by Darryl Weiner (Messinger, Max)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SCHEDULING MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 10/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (fc)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Scheduling Mediation before Mark Greenberg, Esq. Mediation Hearing set for 1/17/2020 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 10/16/2019. See attached document for full details. (btr)
October 14, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added Mark A Greenberg. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Medeiros, Crystalin)
October 14, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Mediator Selection and Hearing. Added Mark A Greenberg. Mediation Hearing set for 1/17/2020. (Greenberg, Mark)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER. Jury Trial set for 7/20/2020 before Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Calendar Call set for 7/14/2020. Amended Pleadings due by 11/4/2019. Discovery due by 3/23/2020. Mediation Deadline 3/30/2020. Pretrial Stipulation due by 5/5/2020. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 9/24/2019. See attached document for full details. (fc)
September 17, 2019 Filing 12 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by AIG Property Casualty Company (Medeiros, Crystalin)
September 17, 2019 Filing 11 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by AIG Property Casualty Company (Medeiros, Crystalin)
September 17, 2019 Filing 10 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by AIG Property Casualty Company (Medeiros, Crystalin)
September 17, 2019 Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 First MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Darryl Weiner. Replies due by 9/24/2019. (Messinger, Max)
September 3, 2019 Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by AIG Property Casualty Company (Medeiros, Crystalin)
September 3, 2019 Filing 7 First MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by AIG Property Casualty Company. Responses due by 9/17/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Policy)(Medeiros, Crystalin)
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING IN PART #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than September 3, 2019. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 8/27/2019. (fc)
August 26, 2019 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT [D.E. 5] by AIG Property Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Medeiros, Crystalin)
August 26, 2019 Reset Deadlines Per DE#4. Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/17/2019 (cqs)
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties by September 17, 2019. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 8/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (fc)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Requiring Removal Status Report. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 8/20/2019. See attached document for full details. (btr)
August 19, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
August 19, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11914839, filed by AIG Property Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Medeiros, Crystalin) Text Modified on 8/20/2019 (cds). No Answer/Motion To Dismiss Filed.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weiner v. AIG Property Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darryl Weiner
Represented By: Matthew David Gottlieb
Represented By: Max Michael Messinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AIG Property Casualty Company
Represented By: Crystalin C Medeiros
Represented By: Steven Charles Teebagy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?