Adams v. Gracious Care Recovery, Inc.
| Favour Adams |
| Gracious Care Recovery, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv62304 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lurana S Snow |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Gracious Care Recovery, Inc. (Hearon, William) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Gracious Care Recovery, Inc.. (Hearon, William) |
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before November 12, 2019. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/23/2019. (mkz)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Gracious Care Recovery, Inc.. Attorney William Charles Hearon added to party Gracious Care Recovery, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hearon, William) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Gracious Care Recovery, Inc.. (dj) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Favour Adams (Gibson, Brandon) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Favour Adams re #1 Complaint filed by Favour Adams (Gibson, Brandon) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/18/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - Summons were not filled out by Attorney (Left Blank). (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gracious Care Recovery, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11989449, filed by Favour Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Gibson, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. Gracious Care Recovery, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gracious Care Recovery, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William Charles Hearon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Favour Adams | |
| Represented By: | Brandon Javon Gibson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
