Ruarte v. First Federal Credit Control, Inc.
| Arlene Ruarte |
| First Federal Credit Control, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv62482 |
| October 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Answer Due Deadline(s) terminated per DE 7 Order. (kpe) |
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER DISMISSING CASE. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. #6 . Upon review of the notice and the record, the Court ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All deadlines and hearings are CANCELED. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 10/27/2019. (dpa)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Arlene Ruarte (Yarbrough, Donald) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Of Referral And Notice Of Court Practices And Procedures. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 10/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Arlene Ruarte. First Federal Credit Control, Inc. served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Yarbrough, Donald) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to First Federal Credit Control, Inc. (bb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) Modified on 10/7/2019 to reflect correct file date (bb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Federal Credit Control, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12041104, filed by Arlene Ruarte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Yarbrough, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruarte v. First Federal Credit Control, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arlene Ruarte | |
| Represented By: | Donald A. Yarbrough |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: First Federal Credit Control, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
