AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. v. Indegene, Inc.
AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. |
Indegene, Inc. |
0:2019cv62587 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodolfo A Ruiz |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint, filed by AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC.. Replies due by 12/20/2019. (Brafman, David) |
Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint, . Responses due by 12/13/2019 per DE 15 (cbr) |
Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #14 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by no later than December 13, 2019. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 12/12/2019. (fc) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint, by AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC.. (Brafman, David) |
Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint, by Indegene, Inc.. Attorney Jamie Mathew added to party Indegene, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 12/11/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Services Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2. Amendment)(Mathew, Jamie) |
Filing 12 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES on or before December 19, 2019. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 11/22/2019. (mhn) |
Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Indegene, Inc. response due 11/27/2019. per DE 11 (cbr) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING IN PART #9 Defendant's Amended Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than November 27, 2019. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 11/12/2019. (fc) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Indegene, Inc. re #9 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time an extension of time to file response to Complaint of filing Proof of Service (Seltzer, Sally) |
Filing 9 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time an extension of time to file response to Complaint by Indegene, Inc.. Responses due by 11/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Seltzer, Sally) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC.. Indegene, Inc. served on 10/23/2019, answer due 11/13/2019. (Brafman, David) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant's Motion does not indicate when Defendant's response is currently due, nor how long of an extension is being sought. Moreover, because service has not been perfected on the docket, the Court cannot determine Defendant's current response deadline. Accordingly, Defendant may refile its motion, indicating when Defendant was served with the complaint and when Defendants response is due. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 11/8/2019. (fc) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to the Complaint by Indegene, Inc.. Attorney Sally Helen Seltzer added to party Indegene, Inc.(pty:dft). (Seltzer, Sally) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. (Brafman, David) |
Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Broward (Office - Ft Lauderdale) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (drz) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Indegene, Inc. (drz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Indegene, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12072522, filed by AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Proposed Summons to Indegene, Inc.)(Brafman, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. v. Indegene, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Indegene, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Sally Helen Seltzer |
Represented By: | Jamie Mathew |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: AXIS MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. | |
Represented By: | David S Brafman |
Represented By: | Mark David Passler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.