MAHLBERG v. INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA INC
Plaintiff: RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG
Defendant: INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA INC and RETAILING ENTERPRISES, LLC
Case Number: 0:2019cv62720
Filed: November 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Patrick M Hunt
Referring Judge: Robert N Scola
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG. RETAILING ENTERPRISES, LLC waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020. (Barros, Acacia)
November 7, 2019 Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against RETAILING ENTERPRISES, LLC, filed by RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(Barros, Acacia)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 11/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (lk)
November 1, 2019 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (pcs)
November 1, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA INC. (pcs)
November 1, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs)
November 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA INC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12113994, filed by RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Barros, Acacia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAHLBERG v. INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG
Represented By: Acacia Regina Silva Barros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RETAILING ENTERPRISES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?