Seeburger v. Assetcare, LLC
| Jason Seeburger |
| Assetcare, LLC |
| 0:2019cv62899 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the 27 Notice of Pending Settlement, which indicates that the parties have reached a settlement of all claims in this matter. Upon consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file the appropriate dismissal documents in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by no later than February 3, 2020. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the final dismissal of this case. All pending motions not otherwise ruled upon are DENIED AS MOOT, all hearings are CANCELLED, and all deadlines are TERMINATED. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/2/2020. (dco)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement Pending by Assetcare, LLC (Wydro, Ashley) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the #1 Complaint by no later than January 6, 2020. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/13/2019. (dco)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Assetcare, LLC. Attorney Ashley Wydro added to party Assetcare, LLC(pty:dft). (Wydro, Ashley) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Assetcare, LLC. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID 113C-12168585, payment transferred from : 0:19-cv-62888-XXXX Seeburger v. Assetcare, LLC, filed by Jason Seeburger. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wagner, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Seeburger v. Assetcare, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Assetcare, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Wydro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jason Seeburger | |
| Represented By: | Jordan Wagner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
