Caplan v. SKY MOTEL, INC.
| Howard Michael Caplan |
| SKY MOTEL, INC. |
| 0:2019cv62985 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Jared M Strauss |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge pursuant to Administrative Order(s) - 2020-5 to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer no longer assigned to case. (jmd) |
Filing 21
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: ( Jury Trial set for 8/17/2020 before Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga., Calendar Call set for 8/11/2020 09:00 AM before Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga., Mediation Deadline 4/27/2020.) Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (jao) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER denying #13 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Cross Inspections of the Facility for Review of Remediation Efforts & Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by SKY MOTEL, INC.. (Grumer, Keith) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to #16 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Howard Michael Caplan, #13 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Cross Inspections of the Facility for Review of Remediation Efforts & Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by SKY MOTEL, INC. Replies due by 1/9/2020. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #14 Order,, Set/Reset Motion/R&R Deadlines and Hearings, to Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Stay by SKY MOTEL, INC.. (Grumer, Keith) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Cross Inspections of the Facility for Review of Remediation Efforts & Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Howard Michael Caplan. Replies due by 1/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A: Division of Corporations and Broward County Property Appraiser Records)(Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 15 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Howard Michael Caplan (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stern, Ronald) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER setting response/reply deadlines as to #13 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Cross Inspections of the Facility for Review of Remediation Efforts & Incorporated Memorandum of Law: Responses due by 1/7/2020, Replies due by 1/8/2020. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/3/2020. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Cross Inspections of the Facility for Review of Remediation Efforts & Incorporated Memorandum of Law by SKY MOTEL, INC.. Responses due by 1/16/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Grumer, Keith) |
| Filing 12 Clerks Notice to Filer re #10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement. Interested Persons Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Interested Persons from the Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Interested Persons. Note - Interested Persons do not appear on the docket sheet. (pes) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to #1 Complaint. Defendant Sky Motel, Inc. shall file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 1] no later than January 2, 2020. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/27/2019. See attached document for full details. (wc)
|
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Howard Michael Caplan (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by SKY MOTEL, INC.. (Grumer, Keith) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer due to the failure to submit a proposed order, as is required by the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga (CMA)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by SKY MOTEL, INC.. (Grumer, Keith) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Keith Thomas Grumer on behalf of SKY MOTEL, INC.. Attorney Keith Thomas Grumer added to party SKY MOTEL, INC.(pty:dft). (Grumer, Keith) |
|
Filing 5
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report and certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 1/10/2020 Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/9/2019. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. SKY MOTEL, INC. served on 12/6/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SKY MOTEL, INC.. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12201125, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caplan v. SKY MOTEL, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SKY MOTEL, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Keith Thomas Grumer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan | |
| Represented By: | Ronald E. Stern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
