Wimble et al v. DMD Florida Restaurant Group A, LLC et al
Katelyn Perez, Lacey Wimble and Jennifer Castaneda |
DMD Florida Restaurant Group A, LLC, Double Mountain Development Ventures LLC, f/k/a Jafrejo Holdings LLC, DMD FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT LLC, DMD RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, Double Mountain Development Ventures LLC and Jafrejo Holdings LLC |
0:2019cv63044 |
December 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodolfo A Ruiz |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 1/29/2020. (mhn) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE by Jennifer Castaneda, Katelyn Perez, Lacey Wimble (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Buckner, Michael) |
Filing 11 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. The Clerk is instructed to CLOSE this case. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 1/23/2020. (mhn) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Jennifer Castaneda, Katelyn Perez, Lacey Wimble (Buckner, Michael) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against DMD FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT LLC, DMD Florida Restaurant Group A, LLC, DMD RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, Double Mountain Development Ventures LLC, filed by Lacey Wimble, Jennifer Castaneda, Katelyn Perez.(Buckner, Michael) |
Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING COMBINED RESPONSES. Defendants shall submit either a single combined response or separate answers by January 29, 2020. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 1/10/2020. (mhn) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Lacey Wimble, Jennifer Castaneda, Katelyn Perez. DMD FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT LLC served on 1/8/2020, answer due 1/29/2020; DMD Florida Restaurant Group A, LLC served on 1/8/2020, answer due 1/29/2020; DMD RESTAURANT GROUP LLC served on 1/8/2020, answer due 1/29/2020; Double Mountain Development Ventures LLC served on 1/8/2020, answer due 1/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Buckner, Michael) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to DMD FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT LLC. (drz) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DMD RESTAURANT GROUP LLC. (drz) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Double Mountain Development Ventures LLC. (drz) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DMD Florida Restaurant Group A, LLC. (drz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against DMD FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT LLC, DMD Florida Restaurant Group A, LLC, DMD RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, Double Mountain Development Ventures LLC, f/k/a Jafrejo Holdings LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12215761, filed by Lacey Wimble, Jennifer Castaneda, Katelyn Perez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) DMD, #3 Summon(s) DMD Ventures, #4 Summon(s) DMD Restaurant, #5 Summon(s) DMD Florida)(Buckner, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.