Murray v. Classica Cruise Operator Ltd. Inc.
| Ruth M Murray |
| Cruise Operator, Inc. d/b/a Bahamas Paradise Cruise Line, Classica Cruise Operator LTD., INC., PARADISE CRUISE LINE OPERATOR, LTD. INC., Cruise Operator, Inc and Cruise Operator, Inc a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Bahamas Paradise Cruise Line |
| 0:2019cv63133 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PERSONS by March 4, 2020. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 2/7/2020. (mhn)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint by Classica Cruise Operator LTD., INC.. Attorney Annalisa Gutierrez added to party Classica Cruise Operator LTD., INC. (pty:dft). (Gutierrez, Annalisa) |
| Filing 8 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Classica Cruise Operator LTD., INC., filed by Ruth M Murray.(Maxion, Jorge) |
| Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ruth M Murray.(Maxion, Jorge) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Ruth M Murray. Classica Cruise Operator LTD., INC. served on 12/26/2019, answer due 1/16/2020. (Maxion, Jorge) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING COMBINED RESPONSES. Defendant Paradise Cruise Line Operator, Ltd., Inc. shall not file a response or answer to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint until all remaining Defendants are served with process. After all Defendants have been served, Defendants shall submit a single combined response or separate answers within the time allowed for the last-served Defendant to respond. See attached document for full details. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 1/6/2020. (mhn)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Ruth M Murray. PARADISE CRUISE LINE OPERATOR, LTD. INC. served on 12/26/2019, answer due 1/16/2020. (Maxion, Jorge) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Classica Cruise Operator LTD., INC., Cruise Operator, Inc, PARADISE CRUISE LINE OPERATOR, LTD. INC.. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Classica Cruise Operator LTD., INC., Cruise Operator, Inc. d/b/a Bahamas Paradise Cruise Line, PARADISE CRUISE LINE OPERATOR, LTD. INC.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12248033, filed by Ruth M Murray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s))(Maxion, Jorge) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
