Alvarez v. United States of America
| Juan Alvarez |
| United States of America |
| 0:2019cv63163 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James I Cohn |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 28 USC 2255 case re #1 Motion (Complaint) to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Juan Alvarez ; Recommending that the Motion to Vacate ECF No. #1 be DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability should not be granted because reasonable jurists would not find the denial to be debatable nor has Movant made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Objections to R&R due by 2/24/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 2/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 1/2/2020. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Motion is premature because the Motion to Vacate is still under preliminary review pursuant to the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, Rule 4(b). Thus, the Motion is denied without prejudice. Upon completion of the review, Movant may renew his motion if he believes he qualifies for the appointment of counsel and the Court will review such motion in light of the circumstances present in the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 1/2/2020. (ac01)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lawrence D. LaVecchio on behalf of United States of America. Attorney Lawrence D. LaVecchio added to party United States of America(pty:dft). (LaVecchio, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Juan Alvarez. Responses due by 1/10/2020 (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James I. Cohn and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 MOTION (Complaint) to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence(2255). NOTE: All further docketing is to be done in the civil case. (Criminal Case # 15cr60094-JIC), filed by Juan Alvarez.(kpe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alvarez v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Juan Alvarez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2255 US Attorney |
| Represented By: | Lawrence D. LaVecchio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
