Khan et al v. Panjwani
Appellant: Huma Aamir and Aamir Khan
Appellee: Ali Panjwani
Case Number: 0:2020cv60034
Filed: January 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy K Altman
Referring Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 0:20-cv-60032-BB. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE Case Number 20-cv-60034-BLOOM. All future filings shall be made in Case Number 20-cv-60032-BLOOM. The parties are also required to comply with all deadlines established by this Court in CaseNumber 20-cv-60032-BLOOM. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/27/2020. See attached document for full details. Associated Cases: 0:20-cv-60032-BB, 0:20-cv-60034-BB (kpe)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by Aamir Khan, Huma Aamir Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/27/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Beth Bloom for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 1/24/2020. Judge Roy K. Altman no longer assigned to case Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/24/2020. See attached document for full details. (jc)
January 27, 2020 Cases associated. (kpe)
January 27, 2020 Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (kpe)
January 21, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joel Maurice Aresty on behalf of Ali Panjwani (Aresty, Joel)
January 7, 2020 Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Parties Re Administrative Order 2015-9 and Amendments to Federal Bankruptcy Rules and Local Rule 87.4 Re Processing of Bankruptcy Appeals (bb)
January 7, 2020 Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb)
January 7, 2020 Filing 2 Bankruptcy Transmittal of re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by Aamir Khan, Huma Aamir (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(smd)
January 7, 2020 Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT (received), Bankruptcy Court case number 19-01040-SMG, filed by Aamir Khan, Huma Aamir.(smd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khan et al v. Panjwani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Huma Aamir
Represented By: Samir Masri
Represented By: Emmanuel Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Aamir Khan
Represented By: Samir Masri
Represented By: Emmanuel Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Ali Panjwani
Represented By: Joel Maurice Aresty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?