Ostfeld v. Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company
| Evan M. Ostfeld |
| Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company |
| 0:2020cv60501 |
| March 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lurana S Snow |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Evan M. Ostfeld (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rodal, Yechezkel) |
| Filing 7 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company (Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company (Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company. Attorney Ernest Henry Kohlmyer, III added to party Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company(pty:dft). (Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
Filing 4
Order Requiring Counsel to Meet, File Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Discovery Report. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 3/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (jbs)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company. (jbs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12569831, filed by Evan M. Ostfeld. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Summon(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rodal, Yechezkel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ostfeld v. Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evan M. Ostfeld | |
| Represented By: | Yechezkel Rodal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Healthcare Collections LTD, Limited Liability Company | |
| Represented By: | Ernest Henry Kohlmyer, III. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
