C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc v. M/Y Vibrance
C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc |
M/Y Vibrance |
0:2020cv61049 |
May 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
William P Dimitrouleas |
Lurana S Snow |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re #9 Warrant In Rem Issued. Correction Other. Issued in Error, Bond has not been posted. (cds) |
Filing 9 (RESTRICTED) Warrant In Rem Issued as to M/Y Vibrance. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 6/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) Security Modified on 6/8/2020 (cds). |
Filing 8 ORDER CONDITIONING ENTRY OF ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO ISSUE WARRANT OF ARREST UPON THE POSTING OF $10,000 SECURITY BOND TO COVER COSTS TO DEFENDANT IN THE EVENT THE COURT LATER DETERMINES THAT THE SEIZURE SHOULD BE VACATED Granting #4 Motion for Issuance of Warrant in rem. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 6/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc re #4 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem of Exigent Circumstances (Karcher, Michael) |
Filing 6 Consent and Indemnification Agreement by C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc (Karcher, Michael) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint National Maritime Services as Custodian by C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc. Responses due by 6/18/2020 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Sub Custodian, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Karcher, Michael) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem by C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Warrant)(Karcher, Michael) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 6/1/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M/Y Vibrance. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12949505, filed by C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Karcher, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc v. M/Y Vibrance | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: M/Y Vibrance | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: C & N Yacht Refinishing, Inc | |
Represented By: | Michael Ramer Karcher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.