Cohan v. Panda Express, Inc.
| Howard Cohan |
| Panda Express, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Panda Express |
| 0:2020cv61439 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lurana S Snow |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER APPROVING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Closing Case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/24/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's RESPONSE to #5 Order of Requirements, Requiring Verified Certificate of Counsel Regarding Any Prior Filings by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PACER Search)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs counsel shall file with the Clerk of the Court the verified statement responding to the questions promulgated above on or before July 27, 2020. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 7/20/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 7/20/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Panda Express, Inc.. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Panda Express, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13192776, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Panda Express, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Panda Express, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Panda Express | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
