Howarth v. Octagon Commerce LLC
| Morgan Howarth |
| Octagon Commerce LLC doing business as Isaleaday LLC |
| 0:2020cv61464 |
| July 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (AO FORM AND COPY OF ORDER MAILED TO COPYRIGHT OFFICE.) (drz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2020: #1 Order Dismisssing Case) (drz). |
Filing 15
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause shall stand DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Morgan Howarth (Wirth, Craig) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Morgan Howarth (Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Extension of Time to Answer or Respond by Octagon Commerce LLC (Ledesma, Roberto) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Roberto Ledesma on behalf of Octagon Commerce LLC. Attorney Roberto Ledesma added to party Octagon Commerce LLC(pty:dft). (Ledesma, Roberto) |
|
Filing 10
Order Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Within twenty-one (21) days of an appearance by a Defendant in this case, the parties are directed to prepare and file a joint scheduling report, as required by Local Rule 16.1. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 7/28/2020. (eca) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Morgan Howarth. Octagon Commerce LLC served on 7/24/2020, answer due 8/14/2020. (Wirth, Craig) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Morgan Howarth (Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 6 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 5 Form AO 120/121. Document Restricted Due to Error; The correct document has been attached to this notice. (drz) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Octagon Commerce LLC. (drz) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DEMANDED) against Octagon Commerce LLC d/b/a 1SaleADay LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13208909, filed by Morgan Howarth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2- Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letters, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 AO Form 121)(Rothman, Joel) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 5 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Howarth v. Octagon Commerce LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Octagon Commerce LLC doing business as Isaleaday LLC | |
| Represented By: | Roberto Ledesma |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Morgan Howarth | |
| Represented By: | Joel Benjamin Rothman |
| Represented By: | Meir Teitelbaum |
| Represented By: | Craig Anthony Wirth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
