Walowitz v. Corporate Coaches, Inc et al
| Cary Walowitz |
| Laurie Barder, Corporate Coaches, Inc and Andrew Bardar |
| 0:2020cv61475 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Patrick M Hunt |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER Setting Status Conference: Telephonic Status Conference set for 9/23/2020 02:50 PM before Judge Roy K. Altman. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 9/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (yha)
|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Corporate Coaches, Inc served on 9/2/2020, answer due 9/23/2020. (yha) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Andrew Bardar served on 8/5/2020, answer due 8/26/2020; Laurie Barder served on 8/5/2020, answer due 8/26/2020. (yha) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Proof of Service Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/28/2020. See attached document for full details. (yha)
|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Corporate Coaches, Inc. (yha) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint filed by Cary Walowitz. Replies due by 9/8/2020. (yha) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER denying the #5 Defendants Motion for Extension of Time as moot. The Defendants shall file their responses and motions jointly. When responding to the Complaint, the Defendants shall file either a joint motion or separate answers within the time remaining for the last served Defendant to respond. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/31/2020. (kge)
|
| Filing 6 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Cary Walowitz to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: walowitcary@gmail.com (pes) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint by Andrew Bardar, Laurie Barder. Attorney Shawn Logan Birken added to party Andrew Bardar (pty:dft), Attorney Shawn Logan Birken added to party Laurie Barder (pty:dft). Responses due by 9/10/2020 (Birken, Shawn) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Bardar, Laurie Barder. (ebz) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 7/22/2020 in the amount of $ 400.00, receipt number FLS13184 (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Bardar, Laurie Barder, Corporate Coaches, Inc. Filing fees $ 400.00, NOT PAID/NO IFP, filed by Cary Walowitz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Text Modified on 7/22/2020 (mee). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
