Hidalgo v. Forest Hill Villa Garden Condominum Association, Inc. et al
| Elvis Hidalgo |
| FOREST HILL VILLA GARDEN CONDOMINUM ASSOCIATION INC, GRS COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, IGLESIAS LAW GROUP, P.A. dba IGLESIAS LAW, Iglesias Law Group, P.A. doing business as Iglesias Law and Forest Hill Villa Garden Condominum Association, Inc. |
| 0:2020cv61556 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/25/2020. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER - It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before October 5, 2020, Plaintiff shall perfect service upon the Defendants or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to perfect service of process. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/25/2020. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/24/2020. (eca) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Compliance of Filing Fees $400.00, receipt number AFLSDC-13331389 re 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Elahi, Shayan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance by Elvis Hidalgo (Elahi, Shayan) |
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Filing fees not paid. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee, and electronically pay the correct fees of $400.00 within 24 hours of this notice. (jua) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Elvis Hidalgo (Elahi, Shayan) |
| Filing 3 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Elvis Hidalgo (Elahi, Shayan) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Elvis Hidalgo. (No Fee paid, no IFP filed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s), #7 Summon(s))(Elahi, Shayan) Text Modified on 8/3/2020. (scn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
