Dasse v. FVE Managers, Inc.
| Agnece Dasse |
| FVE Managers Inc doing business as Five Star Premier Residences of Plantation |
| 0:2020cv61586 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by FVE Managers Inc re 4 Order, of Filing Jurisdictional Brief in support of its Notice of and Petition for Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Kodsi, Neil) Modified Text on 8/11/2020 (ls). |
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF: This case was removed to federal court on August 5, 2020. Upon reviewing the record, it appears this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction, even though Defendant contends diversity jurisdiction exists. No later than August 10, 2020, Defendant shall file a supplemental memorandum, with supporting documents, regarding the Court's subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/5/2020. (lbn)
|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Stay re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Proceedings Pending Arbitration by FVE Managers Inc. Responses due by 8/19/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Arbitration Agreement Signed by Dasse, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Spritz, Stephanie) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13300681, filed by FVE Managers, Inc. (No Answer or Motion to Dismiss filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-State Court Pleadings)(Spritz, Stephanie) Text Modified on 8/5/2020. (scn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dasse v. FVE Managers, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Agnece Dasse | |
| Represented By: | David Mitchell Cozad |
| Represented By: | Chad Evan Levy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FVE Managers Inc doing business as Five Star Premier Residences of Plantation | |
| Represented By: | Neil David Kodsi |
| Represented By: | Stephanie M. Spritz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
