Cohan v. Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP
| Howard Cohan |
| Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP a Florida Limited Partnership doing business as Residence Inn by Marriott |
| 0:2020cv61697 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Defendant Coconut Creek Hotel, M-RI, LLLP's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP. (Hodkin, Adam) |
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #10 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/5/2020. (eyr)
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, in light of #10 Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/4/2020. (AHS)
|
| Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION for More Definite Statement by Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP. (Hodkin, Adam) |
| Filing 9 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for all Discovery matters per DE #7 . Motions referred to Judge Alicia O. Valle. (vjk) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP. Responses due by 9/28/2020 (Hodkin, Adam) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Jury Trial set for 5/24/2021 at 09:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal. Calendar Call set for 5/21/2021 at 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal. Telephonic Status Conference set for 11/17/2020 at 02:30 PM before Judge Raag Singhal. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (eyr) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam Jay Hodkin on behalf of Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP. Attorney Adam Jay Hodkin added to party Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP(pty:dft). (Hodkin, Adam) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP served on 8/26/2020, answer due 9/16/2020. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE.Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall be: double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c).Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Pursuant to Southern District of Florida CM/ECF NextGen Administrative Procedure 3I(6), all proposed orders must be e-mailed in Word format (.doc or.docx) to the division e-mail address at Singhal@flsd.uscourts.gov.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/21/2020. (eyr)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-AFLSDC-13389945, payment transferred from : 20cv61694, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP a Florida Limited Partnership doing business as Residence Inn by Marriott | |
| Represented By: | Adam Jay Hodkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
